Quadro K3000M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
IGP
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 277 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
N14E-Q1
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
7 January 2018
Pipelines
576
1280
Core clock speed
654 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
80.88
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price