Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 71 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 2797 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N14E-Q1 | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |