Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K3000M stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 46% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 271 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-Q1 | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 576 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |