Quadro K3000M vs Radeon RX 460
In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon RX 460
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K3000M and Radeon RX 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 - in Desktops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 436 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
230−240
medium / 768p
120−130
200−210
ultra / 1080p
55−60
120−130
QHD / 1440p
30−35
95−100
4K / 2160p
27−30
50−55
high / 768p
90−95
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
10−11
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 154% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
120−130
medium / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
high / 1080p
14−16
40−45
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
7−8
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
27−30
75−80
medium / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon RX 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-Q1
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 June 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
576
896
Core clock speed
654 MHz
1090 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
67.20
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price