Quadro K3000M vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between Quadro K3000M and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K3000M and Tesla C2075.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 80 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 332 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
210−220
medium / 768p
120−130
190−200
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−35
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
90−95
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 83% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
27−30
60−65
medium / 768p
18−20
35−40
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N14E-Q1
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
576
448
Core clock speed
654 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
32.14
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
