FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K3100M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K3100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 9 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |