FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K3100M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K3100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K3100M.
FireStream 9270
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 44 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |