GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro K3100M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K3100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |