GRID K220Q vs Quadro K3100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro K3100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K220Q stacks up against Quadro K3100M, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K3100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 39 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 271% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 130% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |