Quadro K3100M vs Radeon E8860
When comparing Quadro K3100M and Radeon E8860, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon E8860 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E8860
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 102% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 131 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 1300 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3100M and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |