Quadro K3100M vs Radeon HD 4830
In this comparison between Quadro K3100M and Radeon HD 4830 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4830 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 26% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 131 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Quadro K3100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 333% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |