Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K3100M and Radeon Pro WX 5100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon Pro WX 5100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 7 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K3100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Ellesmere |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 250 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K3100M vs GRID K280Q
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Quadro K3100M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro K3100M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics