Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |