Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 M465X
When comparing Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M465X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M465X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M465X
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 1300 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 37% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |