FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K4000

When comparing FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000 has 6% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 10 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4000 is 78 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 1616 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	27−30
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	110−120	200−210
medium / 768p	90−95	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	90−95
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	90−95
medium / 1080p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 129% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	9−10	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	70−75
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	24−27
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	24−27	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	50−55
medium / 768p	10−11	30−35
high / 1080p	5−6	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	100−105
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
high / 768p	30−33	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K4000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Turks	GK106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	1 March 2013
Pipelines	480	768
Core clock speed	800 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	51.84
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length	163 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	61 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares