GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro K4000

When comparing GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 285 Check Price

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 285	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285 has 155% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 666 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4000 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 285.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 4374 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	45−50
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	200−210
medium / 768p	110−120	170−180
ultra / 1080p	55−60	90−95
QHD / 1440p	30−35	50−55
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	85−90	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	90−95
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	8−9	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	60−65	90−95
medium / 1080p	24−27	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	70−75
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	5−6	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	24−27	50−55
medium / 768p	16−18	30−35
high / 1080p	10−11	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	85−90	100−105
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	30−35
high / 768p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 285.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 285	Quadro K4000
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200B	GK106
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 December 2008	1 March 2013
Pipelines	240	768
Core clock speed	1476 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	51.8 billion/sec	51.84
Floating-point performance	708.5 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	241 mm
Memory bus width	512 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1242 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	159.0 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
CUDA cores	240
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)	128bit
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares