Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K4000
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K4000.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
80 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000 has 433% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 29 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 510 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
200−210
medium / 768p
120−130
170−180
ultra / 1080p
60−65
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
65−70
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
90−95
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
50−55
medium / 768p
20−22
30−35
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
100−105
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K4000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 March 2013
Pipelines
48
768
Core clock speed
300 MHz
810 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
51.84
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
1,244 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth
134.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
61 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
