NVS 510 vs Quadro K4000

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Quadro K4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000 has 128% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 1 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 and Quadro K4000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 13 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro K4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4000 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 3834 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K4000
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	797 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	51.84
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length	160 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	61 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares