Quadro K2200M vs Quadro K4000

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Quadro K4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2200M

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro K4000 has 23% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4000 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M and Quadro K4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 604 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	21−24
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
QHD / 1440p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	4−5
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	35−40	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	230−240	200−210
medium / 768p	200−210	170−180
ultra / 1080p	110−120	90−95
QHD / 1440p	85−90	50−55
4K / 2160p	45−50	30−33
high / 768p	160−170	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	90−95
medium / 1080p	70−75	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 38% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	12−14	7−8
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	35−40	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	100−110	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	70−75
high / 1080p	40−45	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	6−7	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 54% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 31% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	70−75	50−55
medium / 768p	45−50	30−35
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	90−95	100−105
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	30−35
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K4000.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro K4000
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	1 March 2013
Pipelines	640	768
Core clock speed	667 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	51.84
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares