Quadro K4000 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between Quadro K4000 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000 has 128% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K4000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000.
Quadro K4000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K4000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 90 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000.
Quadro K4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 616 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
200−210
220−230
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
30−33
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
70−75
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 27% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
Quadro K4000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Quadro K4000
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 March 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
810 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.84
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,244 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5616 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
134.8 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.21 kh/s
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
61 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price