Quadro K4000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K4000 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro K4000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro K4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−33
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
5−6
1−2
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
200−210
200−210
medium / 768p
170−180
170−180
ultra / 1080p
90−95
90−95
QHD / 1440p
50−55
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
24−27
high / 768p
130−140
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
90−95
95−100
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 2% more, than Quadro K4000.
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
70−75
70−75
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
QHD / 1440p
2−3
1−2
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
9−10
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
Quadro K4000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
medium / 768p
30−35
30−35
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
50−55
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Quadro K4000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GK106
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 March 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
768
96
Core clock speed
810 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
51.84
Floating-point performance
1,244 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth
134.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
61 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
