FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K4000M
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 90 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N14E-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 48.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |