FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K4000M

When choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K4000M.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro K4000M Check Price

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:

Quadro K4000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	10−11
ultra / 1080p	2−3	6−7
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	170−180
medium / 768p	100−110	140−150
ultra / 1080p	50−55	70−75
QHD / 1440p	24−27	40−45
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	27−30
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	65−70
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	20−22
medium / 1080p	4−5	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	18−20
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	35−40
medium / 768p	12−14	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	50−55
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K4000M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	N14E-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	1 June 2012
Pipelines	512	960
Core clock speed	600 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	48.08
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,154 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	37 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K4000M

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares