FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K4000M

When choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M.

FirePro W4190M Check Price

Quadro K4000M Check Price

FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro K4000M here:

FirePro W4190M Laptops

Quadro K4000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)		100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	10−11
ultra / 1080p	1−2	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	5−6	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	170−180
medium / 768p	95−100	140−150
ultra / 1080p	45−50	70−75
QHD / 1440p	24−27	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	70−75	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	5−6	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 60% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	65−70
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	8−9	20−22
ultra / 1080p	3−4	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	2−3	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	7−8	20−22
medium / 1080p	3−4	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	65−70	−
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	16−18	35−40
medium / 768p	12−14	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	50−55
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro W4190M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Quadro K4000M
Architecture	GCN	Kepler
Code name	Mars XTX?	N14E-Q3
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 November 2015	1 June 2012
Pipelines	384	960
Core clock speed	825 MHz	600 MHz
Boost Clock	900 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	48.08
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	1,154 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		37 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus		+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K4000M

FirePro W4190M and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares