GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 930 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 5200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 290% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 264% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 197% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 288% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 272% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX 570
- Quadro K4000M vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000