GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K4000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 696 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1693 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200 | N14E-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 48.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Quadro K4000M vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000