GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 642 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000