GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K4000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 950A
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 393 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 798 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R9 M470
- Quadro K4000M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000