GRID K160Q vs Quadro K4000M
When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro K4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1018 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 314% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro K4000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | N14E-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 48.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |