GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro K4000M
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 43 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 44% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 86% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |