Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K4000M
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and Quadro K4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 122% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K4000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
1−2
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
60−65
170−180
medium / 768p
27−30
140−150
ultra / 1080p
7−8
70−75
QHD / 1440p
−
40−45
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 350% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
10−11
75−80
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
75−80
medium / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
20−22
low / 768p
18−20
65−70
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
0−1
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
−
9−10
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
35−40
medium / 768p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
high / 768p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
N14P-Q1
N14E-Q3
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
192
960
Core clock speed
850 MHz
600 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
48.08
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1,154 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
37 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
+
Check Price
Check Price