Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K4000M

When comparing Quadro K2000D and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000D and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Quadro K4000M Check Price

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:

Quadro K4000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000M has 96% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2000D and Quadro K4000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 354 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Quadro K2000D and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2000D and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	170−180
medium / 768p	110−120	140−150
ultra / 1080p	55−60	70−75
QHD / 1440p	30−35	40−45
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	75−80
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 23% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	5−6	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	20−22
medium / 1080p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	90−95
medium / 1080p	95−100	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	10−12	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	27−30	35−40
medium / 768p	18−20	24−27
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	50−55
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
high / 768p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Quadro K4000M
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	N14E-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2013	1 June 2012
Pipelines	384	960
Core clock speed	954 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	48.08
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	1,154 gflops
Length	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	37 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K4000M

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares