Quadro K4000M vs Quadro M2000
In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4000M and Quadro M2000 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Quadro K4000M and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 3812 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
170−180
230−240
medium / 768p
140−150
200−210
ultra / 1080p
70−75
120−130
QHD / 1440p
40−45
90−95
4K / 2160p
30−33
50−55
high / 768p
110−120
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
120−130
medium / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
70−75
medium / 1080p
20−22
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
65−70
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
95−100
high / 1080p
20−22
40−45
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
70−75
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
35−40
75−80
medium / 768p
24−27
45−50
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K4000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
N14E-Q3
GM206
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
8 April 2016
Pipelines
960
768
Core clock speed
600 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
48.08
55.82
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
37 Mh/s
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price