Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K4000M vs Quadro T2000 mobile

    When comparing Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro K4000M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 mobile Check Price

    Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M or Quadro T2000 mobile here:

    Quadro K4000M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 mobile Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K4000M Quadro T2000 mobile
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K4000M has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
    • Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K4000M and Quadro T2000 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 975 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
    • Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 5200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 10−11 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 6−7 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 1−2 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 21−24 60−65
    medium / 1080p 12−14 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro K4000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K4000M Quadro T2000 mobile
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N14E-Q3 N19P-Q3
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 960 1024
    Core clock speed 600 MHz 1575 MHz
    Boost Clock 1785 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 48.08 114.2
    Floating-point performance 1,154 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 37 Mh/s
    Laptop size large medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares