Quadro K4000M vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 122% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro K4000M and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N14E-Q3 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |