Quadro K4000M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When comparing Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4850 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 810 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 68% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 108% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 960 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce 840A
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295