Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K4000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K4000M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K4000M and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
170−180
220−230
medium / 768p
140−150
190−200
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
QHD / 1440p
40−45
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
110−120
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 64% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−12
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
65−70
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
85−90
high / 1080p
20−22
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro K4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
35−40
60−65
medium / 768p
24−27
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-Q3
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
960
1024
Core clock speed
600 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.08
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
37 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
