Quadro K4000M vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Quadro K4000M and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4000M and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 590
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost