Quadro K4000M vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Quadro K4000M and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4000M and Tesla M10.
Tesla M10
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 433 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N14E-Q3 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |