Quadro K4000M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Quadro K4000M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K4000M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 332 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K4000M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 48% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 91% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X