Quadro K4000M vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K4000M and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K4000M and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 43 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro K4000M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 231% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 247% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 960 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |