Quadro K4000M vs UHD Graphics 630

In this comparison between Quadro K4000M and UHD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4000M will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K4000M Check Price

UHD Graphics 630

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:

Quadro K4000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K4000M	UHD Graphics 630
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

Quadro K4000M has 566% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 300 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	3−4
ultra / 1080p	6−7	1−2
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K4000M and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	120−130
medium / 768p	140−150	95−100
ultra / 1080p	70−75	45−50
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
Quadro K4000M and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	75−80	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 60% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	6−7
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	20−22	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	65−70	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	20−22	8−9
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	7−8	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	7−8
medium / 1080p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	7−8
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	35−40	16−18
medium / 768p	24−27	12−14
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than UHD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	Quadro K4000M	UHD Graphics 630
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5
Code name	N14E-Q3	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 June 2012	1 October 2017
Pipelines	960	24
Core clock speed	600 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	48.08	26.45
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops	460.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	37 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price

Quadro K4000M vs UHD Graphics 630

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares