Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M6000 vs Quadro K4100M

    When comparing FirePro M6000 and Quadro K4100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and Quadro K4100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro M6000 Check Price
    Quadro K4100M Check Price

    FirePro M6000 and Quadro K4100M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro M6000 and Quadro K4100M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or Quadro K4100M here:

    FirePro M6000 Laptops
    Quadro K4100M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro K4100M
    Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K4100M has 132% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
    • Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 44 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
    • FirePro M6000 and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 1300 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 12−14
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 7−8
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
    low / 720p 20−22 24−27
    medium / 1080p 10−12 14−16
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than FirePro M6000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro K4100M
    Architecture GCN Kepler
    Code name Heathrow N15E-Q3-A2
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 July 2012 23 July 2013
    Pipelines 640 1152
    Core clock speed 750 MHz 706 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 3,540 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 32.00 67.78
    Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops 1,627 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 3200 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 102.4 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bus support n/a
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 51 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized large
    Optimus +
    Form factor MXM-B
    StereoOutput3D +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares