FirePro S10000 vs Quadro K4100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro K4100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro K4100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 119 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S10000 and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 706 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI