FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K4100M
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4100M.
FirePro S7000
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4100M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 244 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 81% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K4100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |