GeForce 830A vs Quadro K4100M
When comparing GeForce 830A and Quadro K4100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 830A and Quadro K4100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 830A
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 830A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 376 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce 830A and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 830A and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 63% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 830A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 22 July 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |