GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 73 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 808 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Quadro K4100M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI