GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro K4100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K4100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850A stacks up against Quadro K4100M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |