HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1736 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 48% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 82% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 48% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |