Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 2200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K4100M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |